http://www.matthewjpeterson.com/2009/08/07/classical-republican-ism-v-liberal-ism-stock-definitions/ Matthew J. Peterson, ABD Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:16:57 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 http://www.matthewjpeterson.com/2009/08/07/classical-republican-ism-v-liberal-ism-stock-definitions/comment-page-1/#comment-9 matthewjpeterson Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:57:39 +0000 http://matthewjpeterson.wordpress.com/?p=127#comment-9 I don't think its alright to prefer the Articles. Heh. But you are free to. As for the well done, I just took Alan Gibson's summary: they are mostly his words. He does a great job of synthesizing things. I don’t think its alright to prefer the Articles. Heh. But you are free to. As for the well done, I just took Alan Gibson’s summary: they are mostly his words. He does a great job of synthesizing things.

]]> http://www.matthewjpeterson.com/2009/08/07/classical-republican-ism-v-liberal-ism-stock-definitions/comment-page-1/#comment-8 Robert C. Cheeks Sun, 09 Aug 2009 10:28:53 +0000 http://matthewjpeterson.wordpress.com/?p=127#comment-8 Matt, thanks for this. Well done with an economy of words. I find that in my ramblings in defense of republicanism I really mean a bastardization of cl. lib. and republicanism, probably. Am I wrong, then, in referring to myself as a "Randolphian Terium Quid?" And, is it alright to prefer the ARt. of Confed. to the Constitution? Matt, thanks for this. Well done with an economy of words. I find that in my ramblings in defense of republicanism I really mean a bastardization of cl. lib. and republicanism, probably.
Am I wrong, then, in referring to myself as a “Randolphian Terium Quid?”
And, is it alright to prefer the ARt. of Confed. to the Constitution?

]]>